James Marsalek vs Mate Pavic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L L L L
Form
L W L W L L L W W LHead-To-Head: Marsalek 1 - 1 Pavic
They have played 4 sets in total, with Marsalek winning 2 and Pavic winning 2. The last match between Marsalek and Pavic was at the Mons Challenger, 03-10-2015, Q1 round, I.hard with James Marsalek getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| James Marsalek | 1 |
| Mate Pavic | 1 |
| Marsalek | Stats | Pavic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 537 | Highest Rank | 295 |
| 33 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 1 | Titles | 4 |
| 50% (198-201) | Career Total W/L | 51% (140-135) |
| $2,575 | Career Prize Money | $52,105 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
James Marsalek
Player
Mate Pavic
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Mate Pavic
Player
James Marsalek
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 20 | Games Won | 18 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:20:16 | Average Match Time | 1:20:16 |
| 69% (92/134) | 1st Serve % | 70% (88/125) |
| 67% (62/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (68/88) |
| 57% (24/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (12/37) |
| 25% (3/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 13% (2/15) |
| 36% (45/125) | Return Points Win % | 36% (48/134) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
James Marsalek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Adamson
Player
James Marsalek
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
33%
(
13 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
James Marsalek
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernardo Saraiva
Player
James Marsalek
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
James Marsalek
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(1) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
James Marsalek
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Alon Elia
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Daniel Entelis
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Guez
Player
James Marsalek
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
14 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Marsalek
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mate Pavic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuichi Sugita
Player
Mate Pavic
47%
(
9 of
19)
1st Serve %
47%
(
8 of
17)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
26
Total Points Won
10
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mate Pavic
Player
Zihao Xia
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
14
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mate Pavic
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Mate Pavic
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
101)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Mate Pavic
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
14
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
90%
(
38 of
42)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
17 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Mate Pavic
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Marsalek vs Pavic?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Marsalek Vs Pavic is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (198/201) | Win/Loss | 51% (140/135) |
| 50% (460/466) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (327/317) |
| 50% (4330/4251) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3112/3097) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 257 | Aces Total | 855 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 334 | Total Double Faults | 313 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 115.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 122.19 |
| 62% (4467/7189) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5520/8493) |
| 66% (2959/4467) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3830/5520) |
| 47% (1267/2722) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1370/2973) |
| 43% (329/762) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (280/690) |
| 41% (2958/7221) | Return Points Win % | 37% (3074/8419) |
| 49% (195/395) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (137/271) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (47/97) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (60/113) |
| 49% (64/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (48/98) |
| 81% (196/159) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (148/119) |
| 19% (196/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (148/29) |
| 19% (203/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (127/21) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
